Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26339491-20180810233208/@comment-35072152-20180821072108

Sussettey1 wrote: 1. That’s statement was referring to Elks.

2. Yeah, but it’s not “sick”. I already know that, S1. I meant the same thing BG did. When I said they'd look appealing to the readers, I was also implying that FANDOM hasn't really been taking the voices of the editors into consideration, and in fact have been more looking towards the money aspect of the situation. A user has also pointed out that past updates to FANDOM usually had the same thing. A reasonable amount of users opposed and the updates still went on anyways. They have been making their own decisions regardless of anyone's opposing opinions. True they're a business, and they need money somehow, but how is FANDOM open to people's ideas if they're still going to do the updates anyways? Because look, without us, the editors of this website, it wouldn't have been successful. It probably would no longer exist. Btw I am referring to the link change, not the discussions.